At this point AC and AiS joined the meeting.
AC introduced a draft executive summary for the sewage analytical project and provided an update on drafting progress following a period of fact checking and engagement with relevant bodies.
In considering the draft report, the Board:
- discussed the tone and structure of the executive summary and, subsequently the full report
- discussed the challenges presented by data gaps and the monitoring of water quality in relation to sewage discharges
- noted that further quality assurance and external review would be undertaken with a view to early publication
The Board agreed that PM and CS would consider the final draft of the report before submission to the Board for approval, and that a timescale for publication would be approved at the 24 November 2023 Board meeting.
At this point AC left the meeting
AiS introduced the executive summary and analytical report into air quality in Scotland in relation to particulate matter. The Board considered the level of ambition regarding air quality in Europe and wider international targets.
The Board considered the tone and structure of the report and noted that further quality assurance and external review would be undertaken with a view to early publication. The Board agreed that PM and CS would consider the final draft of the report before submission to the Board for approval, and that a timescale for publication would be approved at the 24 November 2023 Board meeting.
At this point AiS left and HE joined the meeting.
MR introduced the draft consultation response to the Scottish Government’s review of environmental governance arrangements in Scotland.
In discussion, the Board:
- noted the overly narrow scope of the review
- highlighted the review’s failure to address in sufficient detail issues of access to justice, and that the review cannot therefore reach its conclusion that there is no strong argument for an environmental court in Scotland
- agreed that the lack of access to merits-based reviews leaves a clear governance gap, which could, in principle, be filled by a well-constituted environmental court, tribunal or other judicial measures
NL introduced the draft response to the Scottish Government’s consultation on the Human Rights Bill. The Board discussed the contents of the human right to a healthy environment, particularly regarding rights to safe and sufficient water. The Board also expressed the need for the introduction of measures in a timely manner.
The Board agreed that the Chair and RD would approve the final responses to both consultations, by correspondence and on behalf of the Board, following editing to reflect this discussion.
At this point HE left the meeting.